How can studies of phantom kangaroos and different out-of-place
thriller macropods be defined? (public area)



the previous 35 years, I’ve written many a whole lot of cryptozoological articles,
all of which at one time or one other and in a single type or one other have been
printed – all however one, that’s, till fairly just lately. Again within the Eighties, I
penned plenty of articles for a month-to-month British journal entitled The
, which was in reality the very first journal to publish my writings, at
the very starting of my post-university profession as a full-time freelance
cryptozoological researcher and creator. Sadly, nonetheless, after simply over 30
points, The Unknown abruptly folded, and in so doing meant that one
prolonged three-part article of mine that this journal had just lately accepted for
publication by no means noticed the sunshine of day in print type inside it.

causes that I’ve by no means ascertained, I subsequently uncared for to resubmit it
elsewhere, and for over three many years it languished as a typed-out however largely-forgotten
manuscript in a file of my earliest work. Finally calling to thoughts this
article in 2019, nonetheless, I sought out the file containing it, learn it by means of
once more, and was pleasantly shocked by its content material and composition, which I
felt had been greater than enough to warrant its long-overdue publication.

than making an attempt to replace it, nonetheless, which not solely would have been a herculean
activity but in addition would have expanded its already sizeable size very appreciably,
I felt that for historic causes this text may very well be of curiosity to
readers if offered in its unique, pre-existing three-part type, bearing in
thoughts that it constitutes certainly one of my very first items of investigative
cryptozoological authorship. Accordingly, incorporating solely minimal, important
amendments (i.e. ones required to keep up factual accuracy throughout the three
many years since I initially penned it), ‘the article that received away’ was lastly
printed in laborious copy format inside the CFZ
Yearbook 2020
after patiently ready for a mere 32 years to see itself in


The CFZ Yearbook 2020 (© Centre for Fortean Zoology/CFZ Press)

And now,
in the end, it makes its unique on-line debut right here in ShukerNature (the place
on account of its appreciable size I’ve cut up it up into its unique three
components, which will probably be offered as three consecutive weblog posts, starting right here
right now with Half 1).

In so
doing, this resurrected analysis article of mine affords an perception not solely
into phantom kangaroos (a topic by no means beforehand or subsequently written
about by me) but in addition into the primordial competency (or in any other case!) of the then
cryptozoological ‘new child on the block’ investigating and documenting them.



Within the
thoughts of any pupil of pure historical past, Australia is irrevocably linked with
marsupials – an unlimited morphological variety of pouched mammals, whose most
acquainted members are undoubtedly these bounding bipeds the kangaroos. Collectively
with their many smaller family such because the wallabies and potoroos, they’re
recognized collectively as macropods (‘large toes’), and should certainly be the zoological
personification of Down Beneath.


As readily revealed by this
kangaroo skeleton, kangaroos, wallabies, and potoroos aren’t recognized zoologically
as macropods for nothing! The metatarsal bones specifically are very
elongated, as is the fourth digit (toe) (public area)

it could come as one thing of a shock to study that sightings of kangaroo-like
creatures within the wild are additionally being recorded many hundreds of miles past
the Antipodes, in a geographical area the place such animals simply ought to not
be – North America!



these New World anomalies exhibit the intense elusiveness that has earned
comparably evanescent pantheresque creatures such because the Exmoor Beast and
Surrey Puma of Nice Britain the title of ‘phantom felines’; therefore the thriller
hoppers are these days generally known as ‘phantom kangaroos’.

would seem like one of many very earliest incidents on file regarding any
sighting of a supposed kangaroo in America occurred in New Richmond, Wisconsin,
and was documented a yr later by native historian Mrs Ann Epley (and rather more
just lately by veteran American cryptozoologist Loren Coleman in his traditional e book Mysterious
, 1983). She recorded that in a extreme cyclone storm in 1899
that decimated a visiting circus (Gollmar’s) in addition to a lot of New Richmond
itself, eyewitness Mrs Glover reported seeing a kangaroo – presumed to have
escaped from the wrecked circus – operating by means of a neighbour’s yard; it was
by no means captured. Worthy of word right here is the truth that real macropods don’t run
– they transfer by highly effective hopping, bipedal bounds. Equally unusual, furthermore, the
circus proprietor’s son, Robert H. Gollmar, couldn’t recall the circus ever having
owned a kangaroo. Because of this latter part of the incident, this
beast is historically classed as a bona fide phantom kangaroo (regardless of its
aberrant alleged mode of development).

Japanese gray kangaroo Macropus giganteus, bounding bipedally
in typical macropod method (© PanBK/Wikipedia –
CC BY-SA 3.o licence)

the Fifties, a exceptional variety of sightings of thriller macropods have been
documented throughout North America, particularly from the East and Mid-West.
Surprisingly, nonetheless, such creatures had been virtually wholly ignored by
investigators of out-of-place animals – till Fortean writers and researchers
Loren Coleman and David Fideler started an in depth investigation of this
intriguing phenomenon. Certainly, their mixed books, articles, and bulletins dealing
with these beasts represent the definitive (and in reality the solely main)
pre-internet sources of data regarding this topic (therefore are
naturally the sources for plenty of such circumstances talked about on this current article),
and are liable for establishing it as a bona fide phenomenon for critical
cryptozoological examine.

their publications, Coleman and Fideler have offered this topic inside a
chronologically-structured framework, charting and updating its development through
sequence of complete year-by-year studies. Consequently, with a purpose to present
a contemporary perception into the topic, my article will focus primarily not
upon chronological documentation however as a substitute upon the underlying (but not often thought of)
selection of creatures concerned – an strategy not beforehand utilised in
relation to phantom kangaroos. For, as will probably be revealed, these animals
at the moment labelled as such don’t in reality represent a uniform, homogenous set,
however as a substitute could be divided into varied separate classes based mostly upon
morphological and behavioural variations.


1) ‘Regular’

Within the
nice majority of eyewitness accounts regarding phantom kangaroos in North America
that surfaced in the course of the 88 intervening years between the Gollmar circus
incident of 1899 and the yr 1987 through which I initially penned this text,
there may be nothing to recommend that the morphology or behaviour of the creatures
in query was something aside from that of regular kangaroos – besides
for his or her elusiveness. Consequently, I shall discuss with these animals on this
first class of American thriller macropods as ‘regular’ kangaroos. The
following studies of such beasts embrace a number of the most informative on

In 1957,
the 2 younger sons of Barbara Battmer claimed to have spied two kangaroos
hopping by means of an expanse of forest at Coon Rapids, Minnesota, close to to the place
they themselves had been taking part in. They described the creatures as being 5 ft tall
and in color a mix of browns various from mild tan to medium brown. A
yr later, and a few a whole lot of miles away at Platte River, Nebraska,
eyewitness Charles Wetzel, shifting steadily from his plains cabin, approached to
inside 10 yards of a kangaroo-like beast. The latter stood roughly 6 ft
tall, was brown in color, and hopped in pronounced 10-ft bounds through its massive
hind legs – which contrasted sharply with its a lot shorter forelegs.

Crimson kangaroos photographed whereas hopping bipedally in typical
macropod method (© Donald Hobern/Wikipedia –
CC BY 2.0 licence)

these two studies from Mysterious America, Coleman additionally particulars quite a few
related sightings reported from many different American localities in the course of the
subsequent Nineteen Sixties, whereas in November 1974 a 5-ft-tall Chicago specimen
uniformly black apart from a brown face and stomach was noticed by Joe Bernotus
from the window of the prepare through which he was travelling to work. Moreover,
in his e book Bizarre America (1978), Jim Brandon mentions a similar-sized, macropod-mannered
creature that a number of individuals reported seeing bounding by means of cornfields in Du
Quoin, Illinois (a notably widespread State for phantom kangaroo appearances) in
July 1975.

yr 1977 noticed a marked return of macropod mania to the State the place it had all
apparently begun 78 years earlier than – Wisconsin. As documented in Destiny Journal
(September 1978) and subsequently by Stephen McMurray in a letter to The
(December 1986), three separate sightings of ‘regular’ kangaroos
befell right here throughout 1977. As soon as once more, all eyewitness concerned had been satisfied
that the animals had been certainly kangaroos and never any recognized American mammalian

is evidently a great month for recognizing American kangaroos, as a result of two of the
most vital sightings to this point recorded of ‘regular’ New World hoppers took
place inside 24 hours of one another in April 1978, throughout a spate of kangaroo
studies emanating from or close to to Waukesha, Wisconsin. On 23 April, Lance Nero
sighted from his residence two supposed kangaroos hopping out of the adjoining woods.
Furthermore, they left behind well-formed tracks (from which casts had been later
made). Every such monitor consisted of a three-pronged, furciform print (two
prongs pointing ahead, and one backwards – with two rounded projections sited
distally alongside the backward-pointing prong). Regardless of their singular form,
nonetheless, these exceptional tracks had been really ‘recognized’ sooner or later by
sheriff deputies as bizarre deer spoor! Fortunately, opposite proof was
obtained the very subsequent day throughout one other encounter close by, proof that might
not be dismissed so readily this time.


Diagrams of a kangaroo’s foot
(left) and its foot spoor (proper) – the backward-pointing prong within the latter
diagram is the impression typically yielded by the kangaroo’s metatarsals, the central
crescent form is the impression produced by its foot’s palm pad, and the 2
forward-pointing prongs are impressions produced by its foot’s two largest,
principal digits, IV and V (public area)

that incident, two males (who didn’t want to be named) noticed the creature in
query shut to 2 Highways close to Waukesha and, to the delight of cryptozoologists
in all places, they really had a loaded digital camera with them. Two color images
of the animal had been taken, of which one proved to be too blurred for
identification functions. The opposite, nonetheless, whereas slightly darkish and vague,
did reveal an indisputably bipedal creature harking back to a macropod. This
picture (which could be considered on-line right here)
is now owned by Loren Coleman, who, in varied of his publications, describes
the animal depicted as being:

…a tan animal with lighter
brown entrance limbs, hints of a lighter brown hind limb, darkish brown or black
patches across the eyes, inside the 2 upright ears, and presumably surrounding
the nostril and higher mouth space.

One other
important encounter with a thriller macropod occurred in September 1979, when
a dark-coloured specimen harking back to a kangaroo was noticed in Harmony,
Delaware. For as recorded in Pursuit (spring 1980), police known as in to
examine this sighting found not solely uncommon tracks but in addition a 6-inch
strand of fur.

last instance of a ‘regular’ kangaroo provided right here may have been essentially the most
necessary of all. Alas, nonetheless, it was to not be. On 31 August 1981, a trucker
walked into a restaurant at Tulsa, Oklahoma, and knowledgeable a bemused waitress that his
truck had simply hit and killed a kangaroo – whereas swerving, moreover, to
keep away from hitting a second one! Two policemen on the cafe in addition to the waitress
herself all subsequently testified that he then revealed to them the physique of a
3.5-ft kangaroo ensconced behind his truck. Nonetheless, no {photograph} was
taken of this specimen, which was very regrettable as a result of the trucker
afterwards received again into his automobile and (with out anybody apparently recording
his title, handle, or truck license plate) merely drove away with
his cryptozoological cargo – and thus can’t be traced to study any additional


Quadrupedal kangaroos

equally as agile and athletic as these of the ‘regular’ kind, the creatures
constituting this second class of phantom kangaroos exhibit one basic
distinction – these are primarily quadrupedal, bounding not solely upon their
hind legs however upon all fours. Regardless of being far fewer in quantity than these regarding
the bipedal ‘regular’ varieties, studies describing quadrupedal kangaroo-like beasts
have equally been recorded from various areas of North America.


Crimson kangaroo in quadrupedal
stance (public area)

instance, longstanding American cryptozoological investigator Ron Schaffner
studies in his e-newsletter Creature Chronicles (Spring 1983) that in
January 1949, whereas using a Greyhound bus between Columbus and Akron, Ohio, Louis
Staub noticed simply such a beast about 2 miles south of Grove Metropolis, Ohio. In a Cincinnati
report for 10 January, Staub described the creature as being about 5.5
ft tall, brown in color with a protracted pointed head, and resembling a kangaroo
apart from the truth that it hopped on all fours. He acknowledged that he was sure
that it was not a deer.

Loren Coleman data that on 25 November 1974, farmer Donald Johnson reported
seeing a “kangaroo” that was “…operating on all 4 toes”
down the centre of a rural highway by means of Sheridan, Indiana. Moreover, on 14
July 1975, Rosemary Hopwood noticed a 2.5-ft-tall quadrupedal
“kangaroo” whereas driving her automotive alongside Illinois Route 128 close to
Decatur. Nonetheless, in contrast to the earlier two examples, this explicit specimen did
show a modicum of macropod behaviour – by periodically sitting upright on
its haunches. It had pointed ears and a protracted thick tail.


Distinctive specimen

3 consists of a single, distinctive specimen, which, though bipedal, differs
sufficiently from the ‘regular’ kind to warrant separate consideration. In a
letter printed within the Worldwide Society of Cryptozoology’s E-newsletter
(spring 1982), Ronald Quinn recalled that the incident had occurred someday
between 1963 and 1965 at Peck Canyon (50 miles south of Tucson, Arizona) and
had concerned a buddy, Mr Workman. He had lived on this area and had despatched a
letter to Quinn informing him of his encounter, which was as follows.

Click on right here
to see what
this bipedal thriller beast might have been (extra in regards to the latter identification
in Half 2 of this current three-part ShukerNature weblog article).

residence from his mining work one afternoon, Workman’s truck had turn out to be entrenched
in some deep sand. Whereas making an attempt to extricate his automobile, he noticed a
most uncommon creature approaching him from down the sandy wash that he had simply
pushed over. It was a 4-ft-tall bipedal beast that reminded Workman of a
kangaroo. Nonetheless, its tail was held vertically and bore a definite curl at its
tip. Furthermore, this bewildering biped moved by strolling, slightly than by
hopping or bounding, and its hind toes appeared a lot smaller than these of a
kangaroo. After watching Workman for a couple of minutes, the creature walked away
once more, and was not reported thereafter, both by Workman or by anybody else
working in that space.


Aggressive growlers and shriekers

last class of phantom kangaroos assembled right here is extra of a classification of
comfort than the well-defined grouping characterising the sooner
classes lined above, as a result of Class 4’s members seem like as numerous
as they’re weird. But they do in reality share two notable options – a slightly
unnerving tendency to growl or shriek like banshees, and to behave in an alarmingly
aggressive method.

traditional instance, reported intimately by Fideler and Coleman inside their article
‘Kangaroos From Nowhere’ (Destiny, April 1978), is undoubtedly the
pugnacious macropod referred to as the Chicago Hopper. In the course of the morning of 18
October 1974, two patrolmen had been known as to the Northwest residence of a startled
eyewitness to what had gave the impression to be a big kangaroo spied on his porch. Upon
their arrival on the scene, nonetheless, the patrolmen got here head to head with a
creature that remodeled their preliminary amusement into outright alarm. For
though it did seem to the boys to be a kangaroo (and standing about 5 ft
tall), it was growling, in a most disconcerting method.


Two grownup male pink kangaroos engaged
in ritualistic combating – however their herbivorous life-style, kangaroos
could be very belligerent! (public area)

as they quickly found upon drawing nearer, it was very aggressive – delivering
plenty of extraordinarily highly effective (and painful!) kicks earlier than making its escape
from the hapless patrolmen and the hastily-summoned back-up squad automobiles. As
these latter arrived, the creature leaped over a close-by fence into one other
road, and quickly bounded alongside this till it handed out of sight, and into
American legend.

even this belligerent biped appeared benevolent compared to the supposed
big “kangaroo” that terrorised Tennessee throughout 1934. Sighted in
South Pittsburg, it displayed an particularly startling and disquieting
attribute. In stark distinction to the strictly vegetarian weight-reduction plan of typical
kangaroos, the Pittsburg beast was vehemently carnivorous. For in line with the
native farmers, it had slaughtered and partaken of quite a lot of waterfowl, plus
a choice of alsatian canines! Regardless of extended searches, nonetheless, this
rapacious ‘roo was by no means captured.

One among
New Jersey’s most infamous cryptids is the so-called Jersey satan. Nonetheless,
studies describing this beast are so numerous that, as Coleman notes in Mysterious
, it’s fairly evident that a couple of kind of creature is
concerned. A few of these studies describe beasts resembling kangaroos, however with
fairly macabre vocal attributes.


Inventive illustration of the Jersey satan based mostly upon
eyewitness studies (© Richard Svensson)

instance, in 1900 Mrs Amanda Sutts heard a scream one night time close to to the household
farm’s barn. When the household got here outdoors to analyze, a kangaroo-like beast
was spied, which Sutts described as being roughly the dimensions of a small
calf, weighing about 150 lb, and making essentially the most horrific sound “…like a
girl screaming in an terrible lot of agony”. Apparently this sound was typically
heard by the household, emanating from the encompassing countryside; not
surprisingly, it terrified the horses. Comparable studies from elsewhere in New
Jersey additionally exist on file (see The Jersey Satan, 1976 – a really
complete e book on this topic, authored by James McCloy and Ray Miller
Jnr), a few of which describe horse-headed kangaroo-like creatures with wings!

precise truth, a well-known hoax occurred in January 1909 concerning the Jersey satan,
when publicist Norman Jefferies claimed that he had caught the beast, and put
it on show at Philadelphia’s Arch Avenue Museum, charging a small entrance
charge for public viewing. Its true identification, nonetheless, was in the end uncovered – it
was nothing greater than an bizarre Australian pink kangaroo Macropus rufus that Jefferies had earlier obtained from an animal
vendor, and which had then been painted with inexperienced stripes and bore a pair of
synthetic, deftly-attached bronze wings (click on right here to learn extra about this on
ShukerNature). Even so, it’s fascinating that the animal chosen by Jefferies
to signify the Jersey satan was a kangaroo.


categorised America’s phantom kangaroos, it’s now essential to try an
identification of them. As will probably be seen in Half 2 of this three-part article, a
variety of attainable candidates could also be concerned – do not miss it!


Capitalising upon potential kangaroo
aggression – a boxing kangaroo marketed in a sideshow poster printed in
Hamburg, Germany, by Adolph Friedländer, Eighteen Nineties (public area)



Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button