Publish supplied by Lee Hsiang Liow.
We’re very unhappy to say that Lee Hsiang Liow is leaving, having carried out an incredible job as Senior Editor on MEE since 2017. On this weblog put up, Lee Hsiang says goodbye to the journal and discusses the significance of limiting commitments as a way to stop work overload and keep a wholesome work-life steadiness…and study as a lot of Bach’s cello suites as she will handle!
Every of us has 24 hours a day and seven days every week. In that very same period of time allotted, we’ve got to suit work we’re paid to do and work we’re not paid to do (instructing, advising, administration, grant-writing, analysis, reviewing, editorial work, mentoring). All this. On high of regular human “basal” duties, like procuring meals, consuming, sleeping, and functioning as dad and mom, kids, mates and members of the bigger society. I’ve felt, recently, that I’ve a lot lower than twenty-four hours a day, however widespread sense tells me that can’t be true. Various speculation? I’m becoming an excessive amount of in twenty-four hours, maybe like a lot of you/us.
I joined the MEE senior editorial staff in 2017 and it has been very gratifying to see it develop in several methods, and to know that I’ve been a small a part of that progress. I like working with the great MEE editorial staff and the joy of being one of many first to see cutting-edge strategies in submitted manuscripts. However two years of covid-19-related challenges, along with all the things else additionally, signifies that I’ve stretched myself extra thinly than is perfect. By selecting to proceed my self-imposed educational marathon with out the additional kilos that’s the editorial work at MEE, I can save my figurative knees to keep away from untimely retirement from the marathon I like. Am I much less of a scientist now that I’m now not an editor at MEE? Hell, no. I’ll have extra capability to concentrate on the analysis I like, the instructing that evokes me, and to be the member of my lab, household and society that I wish to be.
I not too long ago gave an off-the-cuff non-science speak to early profession scientists. They requested me a query that caught me without warning. They requested: what are my private plans for the subsequent decade? If this had been a job interview, I may need spat out the “customary” reply, on the large grants I wish to apply for and the high-impact papers I’m planning to write down. Blah, blah, blah, you realize. However this query coming so sincerely from youthful people, threw me off. I informed them, whereas I like my science work, I additionally felt like I’ve already lived at the least half my life and that there are different issues I wish to do earlier than the top. They drew it out of me and I don’t thoughts sharing this right here: I wish to study as a lot of Bach’s cello suites as I can handle (and sure, that takes time and internal peace!). I additionally wish to hang around with my sister, whom I’ve been lacking for years. She lives and works about 10,000 km away from me.
Handle yourselves, fellow scientists. You could have your personal “Bach Suites” to study and folks you wish to share high quality time with. Find time for these necessary issues and your science will profit, I imagine. We’d like our personal well being and well-being as a way to be cheap human beings, good colleagues and the very best scientists we aspire to be. As they are saying, generally much less is extra.